not logged in
| In Addition: | |
Posted by:  |
pidunk 11:33 pm UTC 08/24/07 |
| In reply to: | Susan's ''lies'' - Flash 09:10 am UTC 08/24/07 |
> They're not very good are they? Well, that depends on what "lies" you are referring to. I just want to say, that despite what I wrote in the other post just a bit earlier, that your post was on the whole a rather kindly written post, and to acknowlege that is the only sensible thing to do. But, other than that, there are levels of seriousness, and levels of lies, and levels of people lying. Today's headline and the first few paragraphs:
On the one hand, reopening the investigation is a good thing. There is also a lawsuit in the courts concerning the political motivations of the assassinations. If they reopen the investigation I hope that it will be under the light of accuracy, because in that light they will find that those bones do not belong to Alexei. My grandfather is Alexei. And I also know that the girl's remains will not be any of his sisters that I have ever known, of which there were two. The count of the survivors found in the grave, the identifications of the remains, all needs to be redone. Furthermore, the logo of the company Faberge needs to be changed to one of their own, and not take the family crest as their corporate seal, and it is the family crest which has served and continues to serve as the symbol of Russia, although now the Russian Federation. In addition, there needs to be an establishment that properties siezed from the Romanovs were privately owned, and that they come to.................not anyone in Europe..........but to the United States, to my family, including ME. So, if you want some "build-up", there is this, you know. Get the lithium, boys!!!! > > I mean come on... do you think if she was actually trying > to 'lie' to us, to 'bullshit' as many of you like to term > it - she wouldn't come up with something better? > > To me, they're doesn't seem to be any malevolance or > genuine deception here - what purpose would it serve to > trick us into thinking that Jim is a different person for > example. > > Loads of people like to tell little lies to make > themselves feel better, to try and gain the resepect of > other peers, perhaps because they're a bit insecure or > sometimes just to be vindictive. I've never seen any (or > v.little) evidence of that from Susan - certainly no worse > than some of the other members on here who have talked > about fictitious shows they're about to produce etc > etc!!! > > To cut a long story short I don't think Susan is 'lying' - > I think she genuinely believes (a lot) of what she says > and for that I for one, feel sorry for her. I think she > should be pitied, not bullied - as should all people with > psychological issues, for want of a better phrase. > > So what if she is delusional, how do you know it's her > fault - you don't know anything about her - give her a > break. Do you feel like this about all people in society > who have problems - if you do then you're very small > people who don't deserve to be here. > > Recently I've been more offended/fucked off with posts > from Smehead, Pudding et al than I have been from Susan's > and that's a fact. Maybe it's you who should be banned? > > And before you start it has nothing to do with a > lying/pointing out lying hypocrisy - there's far more > mature ways to address it if you really wanted to be > sensible and come up with a rational debate. They way > people have been going on here is so pathetic it's funny. > > Flash | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | Susan's ''lies'' - Flash 09:10 am UTC 08/24/07 |
| Next: | then correction: - pidunk 11:39 pm UTC 08/24/07 |
| Thread: |
|