not logged in
| Susan's ''lies'' | |
Posted by:  |
Flash 09:10 am UTC 08/24/07 |
| They're not very good are they? I mean come on... do you think if she was actually trying to 'lie' to us, to 'bullshit' as many of you like to term it - she wouldn't come up with something better? To me, they're doesn't seem to be any malevolance or genuine deception here - what purpose would it serve to trick us into thinking that Jim is a different person for example. Loads of people like to tell little lies to make themselves feel better, to try and gain the resepect of other peers, perhaps because they're a bit insecure or sometimes just to be vindictive. I've never seen any (or v.little) evidence of that from Susan - certainly no worse than some of the other members on here who have talked about fictitious shows they're about to produce etc etc!!! To cut a long story short I don't think Susan is 'lying' - I think she genuinely believes (a lot) of what she says and for that I for one, feel sorry for her. I think she should be pitied, not bullied - as should all people with psychological issues, for want of a better phrase. So what if she is delusional, how do you know it's her fault - you don't know anything about her - give her a break. Do you feel like this about all people in society who have problems - if you do then you're very small people who don't deserve to be here. Recently I've been more offended/fucked off with posts from Smehead, Pudding et al than I have been from Susan's and that's a fact. Maybe it's you who should be banned? And before you start it has nothing to do with a lying/pointing out lying hypocrisy - there's far more mature ways to address it if you really wanted to be sensible and come up with a rational debate. They way people have been going on here is so pathetic it's funny. Flash | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | The link - daveake 09:33 am UTC 08/24/07 |
| Next: | In Addition: - pidunk 11:33 pm UTC 08/24/07 |
| Thread: |
|