| re: Bad for Good could have done better...... | |
|
Posted by: |
tragichippy 06:35 pm UTC 08/27/07 |
| In reply to: | Bad for Good could have done better...... - Conas 05:01 pm UTC 08/27/07 |
| i agree. i don't think it would have matched Bat, simply because Bat was something totally new and fresh, but touring can really help an album sell, especially back then when it was a much more crucial factor than in today's industry (or so i've been led to believe). also, i'm sure Jim mentioned somewhere (i think in his blog, but i can't be bothered to go search it out), that the BFG songs were written/arranged in a key to compliment Meat's voice and range, rather than his own, while the Batman demos had him in his natural element. > if Jim had sung live and did a tour. He didn't and that's > the reason why Bad For Good didn't sell as much as it > could have. It did sell a lot but it could've sold a hell > of a lot more. I was always under the impression Jim was > paranoid about his singing voice especially around the > time "Bad for Good" was released, Maybe he didn't like his > voice compared to Meat Loaf's and thought he couldn't > match him. I would have liked to hear him singing more. > His voice nowadays is amazing and the proof is in "Angels > Arise/ Graveyard Shift" he needs to sing his songs more. > He's well capable. > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Bad for Good could have done better...... - GTKarber 07:01 am UTC 08/28/07 |
| Next: | re: Bad for Good could have done better...... - AndrewG 06:17 pm UTC 08/27/07 |
| Thread: | |