| re: I care, yes. |
|
Posted by:
 |
Pudding 09:41 pm UTC 09/04/07 |
| In reply to: |
I care, yes. - Jacqueline 01:05 pm UTC 09/04/07 |
|
> Bat Out Of Hell III was crap but that's even more reason
> to make sure it's known that Bat and Bat II were all Jim
> and what was missing from Bat III was Steinman.
Bat3 as a Meat Loaf album isn't half bad, granted it isn't half good either and it definitely shouldn't be tagged as a Bat Out Of Hell album.
I'm failing to understand your logic though in arguing that Jims name shouldn't have anything to do with Bat3, yet you take umbrage when Jims name isn't mentioned enough times on something that's going to be seen as Bat3 related.
What would you want Meat Loaf to say in the doco? "Yeah, Jimmy was a genius on Bat1 and Bat2, he made me what I am today. But I'd just like the audience to know he had FUCK ALL to do with Bat3, which you can tell cos it's a load of bollocks. I've right Royally shafted Jim on that, because I've conned the public in thinking that he had - HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!"
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: I care, yes. - Rob 11:57 pm UTC 09/04/07 |
| Next: |
re: I care, yes. - Bright_Eyes 09:06 pm UTC 09/04/07 |
|
| Thread: |
|