| re: Admitting defeat | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 08:50 am UTC 09/07/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Admitting defeat - Pudding 08:16 am UTC 09/07/07 |
And you would be just as prosecutable for inciting, inviting, encouraging, and telling them to do so, in public, right here. Right here, you are telling someone to kill me. > Wanting someone dead isn't the same as wanting to murder > someone. I wouldn't waste and airfare in murdering you, > but I probably would buy a bottle of champagne to the > person that did. > > > Since you often think of stalking, death and murder, you > > do indeed tend to bring this kind of evidenciary > > requirement in a clouded vein disguised as a comment, > > don't you? And this is all you do. > > > > > > > Which makes it the most factual as it can be proven beyond > > > any reasonable doubt > > > > > > > Nope. Only the most verifiable under the circumstances. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jim's opening it in England, not in the USA. That > > > > > should > > > > > > help with the fares and such. > > > > > > > > > > That's probably the most factually sane thing you've ever > > > > > posted > > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Admitting defeat - Pudding 08:16 am UTC 09/07/07 |
| Next: | re: Admitting defeat - Pudding 10:17 am UTC 09/07/07 |
| Thread: |
|