HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Admitting defeat

Posted by:
Pudding 10:17 am UTC 09/07/07
In reply to: re: Admitting defeat - pidunk 08:50 am UTC 09/07/07

I don't believe I did tell anyone to kill you, I said I probably would buy a bottle of champagne to the person that did.

> And you would be just as prosecutable for inciting,
> inviting, encouraging, and telling them to do so, in
> public, right here. Right here, you are telling someone to
> kill me.
>
>
> > Wanting someone dead isn't the same as wanting to murder
> > someone. I wouldn't waste and airfare in murdering you,
> > but I probably would buy a bottle of champagne to the
> > person that did.
> >
> > > Since you often think of stalking, death and murder, you
> > > do indeed tend to bring this kind of evidenciary
> > > requirement in a clouded vein disguised as a comment,
> > > don't you? And this is all you do.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Which makes it the most factual as it can be proven beyond
> > > > any reasonable doubt
> > > >
> > > > > Nope. Only the most verifiable under the circumstances.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > Jim's opening it in England, not in the USA. That
> > > > > > should
> > > > > > > help with the fares and such.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That's probably the most factually sane thing you've ever
> > > > > > posted
> > > > > >


reply |

Previous: re: Admitting defeat - pidunk 08:50 am UTC 09/07/07
Next: re: Admitting defeat - pidunk 10:28 am UTC 09/07/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE