| re: Jim's Blog |
|
Posted by:
 |
pidunk 10:31 am UTC 09/07/07 |
| In reply to: |
re: Jim's Blog - Pudding 10:25 am UTC 09/07/07 |
|
>
>
> >
> >
> > > > Without Jim Cypherd there would have never been any Jim
> > > > Steinman music, period. None.
> > >
> > > This is why JD is getting a reputation for being a useless
> > > incompetent cunt because she won't ban your ass for
> > > fucking lying out of it.
> >
> > Jacqueline is getting no such reputation
>
> As sad as it is, she is. Which is a shame, because 6
> months Jacqueline in my eyes could do no wrong, but then
> you started posting all your lies and bullshit and she
> wouldn't get rid of you. Very good board members left
> because they could deal with your crap and she gave them a
> slap in the face when they did.
Has it occured to you that they are not lies and Jacqueline is held back because they are not lies and you can't do anything to change that or the truth? Has it occured to you that you make what you declare on every page you post about something that could be true or false, because hiding behind a cutesy name you are a tyrant and a gangland thug?
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Jim's Blog - Pudding 10:25 am UTC 09/07/07 |
| Next: |
re: Jim's Blog - Klasien 11:47 am UTC 09/07/07 |
|
| Thread: |
|