not logged in
| re: Jim's Blog | |
Posted by:  |
Klasien 11:47 am UTC 09/07/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Jim's Blog - pidunk 10:31 am UTC 09/07/07 |
| Has it occurred to you that they are lies, but just not of such significance that they need to be addressed? Sometimes addressing the lies openly gives them more attention and credit than they deserve. My only regret is that some of the regular posters here cannot share such a view. The only flaw I can see in JD's plan is that it must be really bad for your health to allow you to continue posting and being insulted here, and that these insults give your stories exactly the amount of attention JD and Jim seemed to want to prevent by not banning you. Though I can understand why people would react to you in such a fashion, I must say I disagree with their course of action. That said, if you really dislike us so much, why don't you leave us alone and go back to your business? We have made it clear to you in every way possible that we are not interested in your version of the truth, whether this be real or false. It should be clear to you by now that we do not care what you have to say and I simply cannot imagine why anyone would continue visiting a place where they and their views are so clearly unwanted. And you really only have yourself and your repettitive posts to blame for that! And let us not forget you have done a fair share of insulting anyone who would not immediately adapt your view on matters such as Jim. Is your version of the truth so important to you that it requires even the sacrifice of your health to put it forward? For rest assured, you have made your views known to the public. What we, the public, do with it is up to us and should be of no consequence to you and your message. You have done what you came here to do, now leave? As for the death threats, I too find them to be annoying to read. I for one do not wish you to die, you are of too little significance for me to care whether you live or die, and I wish people would stop reacting in such a childish, unintelligent and non-creative fashion. As far as I am concerned, you job here is done, and I do wish you would stop doing what you are doing here and just leave us to our worshipping. As I have said before, since it will make no difference to me which version of the truth will eventually turn out to be true, so there really is no need to honour my post with another review of your ideas. K. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Without Jim Cypherd there would have never been any Jim > > > > > Steinman music, period. None. > > > > > > > > This is why JD is getting a reputation for being a useless > > > > incompetent cunt because she won't ban your ass for > > > > fucking lying out of it. > > > > > > Jacqueline is getting no such reputation > > > > As sad as it is, she is. Which is a shame, because 6 > > months Jacqueline in my eyes could do no wrong, but then > > you started posting all your lies and bullshit and she > > wouldn't get rid of you. Very good board members left > > because they could deal with your crap and she gave them a > > slap in the face when they did. > > Has it occured to you that they are not lies and > Jacqueline is held back because they are not lies and you > can't do anything to change that or the truth? Has it > occured to you that you make what you declare on every > page you post about something that could be true or false, > because hiding behind a cutesy name you are a tyrant and a > gangland thug? > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Jim's Blog - pidunk 10:31 am UTC 09/07/07 |
| Next: | re: Jim's Blog - Smeghead 05:57 pm UTC 09/07/07 |
| Thread: |
|