| re: Whistle gets a second wind | |
|
Posted by: |
Leesa (gallytrotter@mchsi.com) 11:31 pm UTC 09/09/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Whistle gets a second wind - Jacqueline 11:16 pm UTC 09/09/07 |
| THANK YOU, Jacqueline for the best post appearing here since April. I wish no ill to Susan and your advice should go a long way in resolving a reoccurring catalyst for the spewed hatred. Again, I applaud your taking what I see as the RIGHT stand. Stick to your guns. You've been the epitome of fair in a very difficult situation. Hats off to the right choice. Cheers! Leesa J > Jim Cypherd can represent himself on his own message board > and site. Not here. > > Asking Jim Cypherd to turn up here is no solution -- just > an indication that you are not willing to do your part in > order to stay a member of this board. > > You have a choice to make, Susan. I have been very fair > and very kind to EVERYONE INVOLVED - you and those that > hate you. Now you can all come to the table with more > than you've been offering or you can all hit the road. > > xxx > JD > > > > > > > > > > > > > Susan, give it up with the Jim Cypherd stuff!! > > > > > > You are totally guilty of not making an effort to be taken > > > seriously here. > > > > > > It doesn't matter what you believe about Cypherd, Rocky > > > Horror or whatever else. On this board --- IF YOU REALLY > > > WANT TO BE A MEMBER AND NOT A NUISANCE --- stick to your > > > opinions on Steinman. > > > > > > > Jim Steinman is a very nice person. He is highly > > imaginitive, intelligent, and supportive to others. He is > > a good friend to his good friends when needed. I have > > nothing bad to say about Jim Steinman. He describes the > > work very well, he discusses the projects very well, and > > he wears black gloves very well. I do not know much else > > about Jim Steinman, but I do know about the works under > > the name Jim Steinman, and those works are wonderful, > > profound, giving in many ways, and are timeless classics > > in their own rights. The music of Jim Steinman, is like > > none other. I could omit the name Jim Cypherd, and discuss > > the works easily. > > > > Then I would like to see Jim Cypherd represent himself for > > his own interests accordingly in place of myself in so > > doing. I think that could develop the resolution you seek. > > > > > > > > > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Whistle gets a second wind - rockfenris2005 04:48 am UTC 09/10/07 |
| Next: | re: Whistle gets a second wind - pidunk 11:27 pm UTC 09/09/07 |
| Thread: | |