| re: Whistle gets a second wind | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 11:27 pm UTC 09/09/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Whistle gets a second wind - Jacqueline 11:16 pm UTC 09/09/07 |
Jacqueline, If you re-read the post to which you first replied, I did not make reference to Jim Cypherd other than a private quote between two people on the telephone...and the entire post concerning Whistle Down The Wind and then the Disney details afterwards, had no such designation and is exactly as you requested before you requested it. So, please, re-read the post, and do see that I am making an effort...and there is one post in another section in which I did not, which was before your request. I am not asking Jim Cypherd to come to the board. He can represent his interests in other ways. If he should arrive at this board, I doubt it would make anyone's difference. I have no reason not to comply with your request. Jim Cypherd is on his own. > Jim Cypherd can represent himself on his own message board > and site. Not here. > > Asking Jim Cypherd to turn up here is no solution -- just > an indication that you are not willing to do your part in > order to stay a member of this board. > > You have a choice to make, Susan. I have been very fair > and very kind to EVERYONE INVOLVED - you and those that > hate you. Now you can all come to the table with more > than you've been offering or you can all hit the road. > > xxx > JD > > > > > > > > > > > > > Susan, give it up with the Jim Cypherd stuff!! > > > > > > You are totally guilty of not making an effort to be taken > > > seriously here. > > > > > > It doesn't matter what you believe about Cypherd, Rocky > > > Horror or whatever else. On this board --- IF YOU REALLY > > > WANT TO BE A MEMBER AND NOT A NUISANCE --- stick to your > > > opinions on Steinman. > > > > > > > Jim Steinman is a very nice person. He is highly > > imaginitive, intelligent, and supportive to others. He is > > a good friend to his good friends when needed. I have > > nothing bad to say about Jim Steinman. He describes the > > work very well, he discusses the projects very well, and > > he wears black gloves very well. I do not know much else > > about Jim Steinman, but I do know about the works under > > the name Jim Steinman, and those works are wonderful, > > profound, giving in many ways, and are timeless classics > > in their own rights. The music of Jim Steinman, is like > > none other. I could omit the name Jim Cypherd, and discuss > > the works easily. > > > > Then I would like to see Jim Cypherd represent himself for > > his own interests accordingly in place of myself in so > > doing. I think that could develop the resolution you seek. > > > > > > > > > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Whistle gets a second wind - Leesa 11:31 pm UTC 09/09/07 |
| Next: | re: Whistle gets a second wind - Rob 11:10 pm UTC 09/09/07 |
| Thread: | |