| re: Whistle gets a second wind | |
|
Posted by: |
pidunk 12:56 am UTC 09/10/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Whistle gets a second wind - Jacqueline 12:49 am UTC 09/10/07 |
I have just asked Smeghead to be specific. Please permit him to state his case clearly, and then we can begin fresh. I have no problem beginning fresh, but SMeghead really must explain himself. One post to explain himself, that is all I ask. Then I won't even reply to it. Just let him justify his behavior. I will write my reply elsewhere. > Look, this is it. Make a choice. Start fresh or not. If > this crap is here tomorrow I'm putting you off the board. > > > > > > You have a choice to make, Susan. I have been very fair > > > and very kind to EVERYONE INVOLVED - you and those that > > > hate you. Now you can all come to the table with more > > > than you've been offering or you can all hit the road. > > > > > > xxx > > > JD > > > > > > You can ban me if you want... but I will not remain silent > > when I see her spew her shit. If she stops lying my posts > > will not be about her. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Whistle gets a second wind - Pudding 01:46 am UTC 09/10/07 |
| Next: | re: Whistle gets a second wind - Jacqueline 01:47 am UTC 09/10/07 |
| Thread: |
|