not logged in
| re: my thoughts on the Bat musical | |
Posted by:  |
Scaramouche 12:06 pm UTC 09/12/07 |
| In reply to: | my thoughts on the Bat musical - RadioMaster 09:26 am UTC 09/12/07 |
| I think Bat 3 is totally irrelevant to what Jim is writing, and obviously shit on most people's shoes. To justify the musical (to most of the public) he only really needs to include BOOH, but he has blogged about including: Children, Body, Who Needs The Young, 2/3, Lemon & Pig, with possibly Angels Arise/Graveyard Shift. I can also see these being in: Heaven Can Wait, Frying Pan, All Revved Up, Lost Boys & Golden Girls, All Coming Back, Good Girls Go To Heaven I don't get a 'vibe' for these: FCOL, It Just Won't Quit, Everything Louder, Objects, Paradise, RNR Dreams, Anything For Love (although this might sneak in, as it was a massive hit). Would like to see these: Kill You, Surf's Up, Bad For Good, Faster Than The Speed Of Night, Everything Is Permitted Still think the show should open with Bat (see my link): http://www.jimsteinman.com/messageboard/d.php?id=1314 > So, Jim's writing his booh musical, which is more or less > another incarnation of Neverland, but on a different > matter: > > IMM there are(could be?) two reasons for doing it now: > a) 30th anniversary of BOOH and > b) finishing of the trilogy > > and there's the problem. > I assume it'll consist mostly of Bat songs, but what's he > gonna do about bat 3? > Will he just include songs from booh and bat2? will he > include his songs that ended up on bat 3 (pigs, break it, > etc). This would cause problems with, BFG, which is on bat > 3, but for me isnt a bat song, it's a bfg song. (you could > argue that frying pan, rock n roll dreams are also bfg > songs, but for me they became bat songs with the superior > production (and of course vocals) on bat2, while bfg on > bat 3 doesnt really have a better production. > Seize the night would cause another problem as already > appeared in DOTV/still appearing successfullyg in TDV. > So, the next possibility would be to include Desmonds > songs in the musical. Do i really believe in/even want > that? Hell, no! > So the last possibility (IMO!) would be to include the > songs he wanted to end up on bat 3, but these didnt(!) end > up on bat 3 and so are technically no bat songs. > > thoughts? | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: my thoughts on the Bat musical - RadioMaster 03:24 pm UTC 09/12/07 |
| Next: | re: my thoughts on the Bat musical - Dr_Rock 10:54 am UTC 09/12/07 |
| Thread: | |