| re: Pt. 2 | |
|
Posted by: |
RadioMaster 02:44 pm UTC 10/03/07 |
| In reply to: | Pt. 2 - The_Jackster 10:44 am UTC 10/02/07 |
> Even reading the documentation on the whole Bat II > preproduction in those court documents was an eye-opener. > When Meat has to ask his permission to use the title and > cede control of pretty much everything to Jim to get the > album done, it shows you two things: > > 1) Meat would stop at nothing to get his comeback album > because he's planned for his career and where Jim fits > in. > > 2) Jim would stop at nothing to help the comeback album > into play on his terms to revive his idea, his idealized > vision of Meat Loaf, as opposed to the real Meat. > Dont you take the whole thing a bit too melodramatic? Ok, maybe (maybe as well never know for sure) they never been best friends, but I guess they didnt loathe each other with hatred either. After all theyre both just normal people (well, sort of :p) with a normal relationship. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | Pt. 2 - The_Jackster 10:44 am UTC 10/02/07 |
| Next: | re: Confusion about the new interview - John_Galt 01:52 pm UTC 10/01/07 |
| Thread: | |