| re: You have got to be kidding | |
|
Posted by: |
EJXD2 (EddieD317@gmail.com) 10:25 pm UTC 10/09/07 |
| In reply to: | re: You have got to be kidding - Pudding 09:53 pm UTC 10/09/07 |
| I don't know the law, perhaps Mike Dube can weigh in, but there's definitely a point where it's considered plagiarism. That said, I'm not saying this is a carbon copy. I'm only saying that the melody is reminiscent of a Jim song, which has correctly been identified as IACBTMN. EdD > If the beginning of the song is all we're going on, then > you might have a point, but the beginning wasn't all we > were asked to focus on. I was listening to the whole song > and not just 3 or 4 notes at the start. > > There's only so many notes that can be played on a piano > and in a certain order, laws of average would state that > sooner or later, something is going to sound similar to > something else. > > > Pudding get your ears checked! I have a cold and can't > > hear shit but i can easily see how much the begining is > > obvious IACBTMN. > > > > > The song sounds nothing like it. > > > > > > I don't think it sounds anything like Jim, more Tori Amos > > > if anything. It's kinda average in my opinion....BWTFWIK | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: You have got to be kidding - Pudding 09:53 pm UTC 10/09/07 |
| Next: | re: You have got to be kidding - Pudding 12:42 am UTC 10/10/07 |
| Thread: |
|