HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: "I haven't done all I wanted to do yet. I have too long a list. But I want to write something really great of all times. Not necessarily music. Just something that really matters. "Bat O

Posted by:
Belmont 12:34 am UTC 10/12/07
In reply to: "I haven't done all I wanted to do yet. I have too long a list. But I want to write something r ... - Bright_Eyes 12:08 am UTC 10/12/07

I think Jim recycles alot of his old work because he sees so much he can do with what he already has. He also probably has a ton of new material but thinks its not quite ready yet. To me, Jim sees to be a perfectionist when comes to his music. If he doesn't feel its complete, then he dosesn't release it. I'm a poet, so when I write I want to be perfect TO ME!!! I don't care if its not perfect to someone else because that doesn't matter. I think thats how Jim might be when it comes to his music and work. If it takes a long along time to make something great, then it just takes a long time. This is just what I think.

> I read the interesting interview in the Hartford
> newspaper. Thanks to whoever posted it, and to Steinman
> for answering the questions. One of the parts that really
> stood out was:
>
>
> "I haven't done all I wanted to do yet. I have too long a
> list. But I want to write something really great of all
> times. Not necessarily music. Just something that really
> matters. "Bat Out of Hell" did that, I guess, but I want
> to do more."
>
>
> This was surprising to read because I had started to think
> of Steinman was somebody who gave up, maybe 15 or so years
> ago, on the kind of renegade creativity he had at the
> beginning of his career.
>
> If he has "too long a list" I have to wonder why so much
> of his work in the past decade has been recycled, and why
> in the past two years he has focused on projects that are
> primarily recycling of past work.
>
> If he's got a long list, what is the guy waiting for?
>
> Here's a list of all the songs Jim has commercially
> released since 1993 that are written solely by Steinman,
> and that were not a recycling of something already
> commercially released:
>
>
> - If It Ain't Broke (Break It) - from low-budget
> Wuthering Heights CD
>
> - Cry to Heaven - Desmond Child's mediocre production
>
> - In The Land of the Pig, The Butcher Is King - Desmond
> Child's mediocre production
>
>
> Unless I'm forgetting something, that's the whole list.
> (Unless you count Everly Bros.) Kinda shocking that it's
> just those three songs, for a full 14 years of his career.
> And none of those are high-budget Steinman productions.
>
> I think that's why I used to think The Dream Engine was
> such a big deal, because they would have added at least 3
> great songs to that list, in presumably high-quality,
> Steinman/Rinkoff productions. Excitement over TDE was
> partly a matter of starvation, because it had been so long
> since new Steinman songs were released, and it looked like
> TDE would do that.
>
> What explains his trend toward recycled work? Could it be
> a financial thing? Maybe, but he could also try to make
> money with new work, and it's hard to believe that he'd be
> poor if he didn't recycle his old hits.
>
> This comment of Steinman's stands out to me because it's
> mostly in new work that I'd be interested. When I first
> heard Steinman's work, I was interested in hearing all of
> it over and over again, and reading anything that could be
> read about it. Now I've gotten tired of that, and I rarely
> listen to Steinman's work. But I'd still be interested in
> new songs, as long as they're good, because at least
> they're new.
>
> Is it possible Steinman wants to write a lot of new stuff,
> but doesn't have the creative juices flowing anymore?
>
> I'm also kinda intrigued by the distinction between work
> that really matters and work that does not. How do you
> decide which Steinman project really matters? Does it have
> to be serious or political or realistic to matter? Does it
> just have to be very successful or influential? I've
> always thought of Steinman's work as stuff that does not
> really matter, but that is still great anyway.


reply |

Previous: re: "I haven't done all I wanted to do yet. I have too long a list. But I want to write somethi ... - Willis 01:38 am UTC 10/12/07
Next: For Jacqueline - Grace 02:36 pm UTC 10/11/07

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE