| re: Jacqueline | |
|
Posted by: |
Mr.Egg 02:17 pm UTC 10/21/07 |
| In reply to: | Jacqueline - Markus 01:46 pm UTC 10/21/07 |
| I would be in favour too. Some of the people who attack me, Belmont and Bright Eyes, sound very similar to each other. It's their use of language. Even the punctuation mistakes are the same. I feel that someone posts an attack and then logs in with a different name to support the attack they have made. I won't mention any names in case I get in trouble or make a mistake with my accusations. The thing that I know for sure is that Belmont, Bright Eyes and myself are dedicated Jim fans. We do not deserve to be attacked. Sometimes we are talking about Jim and someone starts posting in using multiple screen names to tell us that we shouldn't be talking about things that have nothing to do with Jim. It can be very confusing. Often we are accused of being someone called Susan. I have no idea who Susan is. As Belomont asked: "Who the hell is Susan"? Last night I read a post where someone claimed that Bright Eyes was Susan. If Susan is as bad as they say she is, then Bright Eyes could not possibly be her. Bright Eyes is very polite and intelligent. She wrote an excellent post about how the "Steinman Sound" is created and those who hate accused her (or him - it doesn't matter) of being a troll. > Will we get IPīs or not? Just wondering. I vote PRO! > > Markus. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Jacqueline - sturse 06:34 pm UTC 10/21/07 |
| Next: | re: Jacqueline - stewbeef 07:05 pm UTC 10/21/07 |
| Thread: |
|