| re: Jacqueline |
|
Posted by:
 |
Markus 02:26 pm UTC 10/21/07 |
| In reply to: |
re: Jacqueline - Mr.Egg 02:17 pm UTC 10/21/07 |
|
I only hope you wonīt begin to tell us that there are at least two different Jims shown on top of this page.
Markus.
> I would be in favour too.
>
> Some of the people who attack me, Belmont and Bright Eyes,
> sound very similar to each other.
>
> It's their use of language. Even the punctuation mistakes
> are the same.
>
> I feel that someone posts an attack and then logs in with
> a different name to support the attack they have made.
>
> I won't mention any names in case I get in trouble or make
> a mistake with my accusations.
>
> The thing that I know for sure is that Belmont, Bright
> Eyes and myself are dedicated Jim fans. We do not deserve
> to be attacked.
>
> Sometimes we are talking about Jim and someone starts
> posting in using multiple screen names to tell us that we
> shouldn't be talking about things that have nothing to do
> with Jim. It can be very confusing.
>
> Often we are accused of being someone called Susan.
>
> I have no idea who Susan is. As Belomont asked: "Who the
> hell is Susan"?
>
> Last night I read a post where someone claimed that Bright
> Eyes was Susan. If Susan is as bad as they say she is,
> then Bright Eyes could not possibly be her.
>
> Bright Eyes is very polite and intelligent. She wrote an
> excellent post about how the "Steinman Sound" is created
> and those who hate accused her (or him - it doesn't
> matter)
> of being a troll.
>
> > Will we get IPīs or not? Just wondering. I vote PRO!
> >
> > Markus.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Jacqueline - stewbeef 07:05 pm UTC 10/21/07 |
| Next: |
re: Jacqueline - Mr.Egg 02:36 pm UTC 10/21/07 |
|
| Thread: |
|