not logged in
| re: The SHOTish version... | |
Posted by:  |
Pudding 10:16 pm UTC 10/24/07 |
| In reply to: | The SHOTish version... - LordRahl 02:20 pm UTC 10/24/07 |
| You can't blame Amanda for defending her Dad, even if she is/was wrong. I know what you mean about some Pro-Loafers though, they jump on the fucking bandwagon at the drop of an hat or a red hankie, absolutely no self-respect some of them. > Man Pudding, I posted about this a million times. > > Ill give you the short version. If you want the more in > depth one there is a post I did somewhere in one of Eggs > things about this (where milton obviously found my > original statements) > > Anyways when the AP started telling about the Jim/Meat Bat > out of Hell 3 name fiasco I posted an article as well as > my thoughts on the situation on a Myspace forum. Right > after posting it Amanda responded with saying that the > fight is no ones business but her fathers and Jims and > that I didnt even post the real article. > > Everything went crazy from there since it was almost all > pro Meat Loaf fans saying I was disrespecting Amanda (the > biggest thing to upset me was I posted a link to my source > and no one even bothered to look at it). That and they > all came off as a bunch of know it alls and jerks (as many > of you know from the UK forum I guess, I wont even touch > that place with a thirty three and a half foot pole). > > Oh and my opinion I spent a while trying to word properly > so these mongoloids would see where I was coming from was > also completely ignored. I feel this happened because > the idiots chose to argue with me in the hopes they could > be Amanda's buddy and thus meet Meat. > > My opinion went something like this: > > "How would you guys feel if Jim released an album called > Bat out of Hell 3 that only had Meat singing a few songs > and the rest by all new people? That wouldn't feel like a > Bat out of Hell to me either. I think the same is being > done here but with Meat taking advantage." > > There is a link to the whole argument in one of my posts > down the page a bit and you can read the madness though it > is over a year old and since some of the people involved > have since deleted their accounts there are references and > quotes of people whose posts cant be read. As well as > some facts that ended up being changed after the actual > release of the album (I think i quoted the wrong number of > Jim songs or something). > > I hope that clears it up, and while it is alot I just > wrote, that really is the SHORT version. It is probably > best to leave it all in the past and just know that I dont > get along well with Amanda, not that anyone else should > feel that way. Just my own personal experience with her. > > A.G. > > > > > I might aswell jump in feet first and say "WHAT THE HELL > > ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?" > > > > > Nobody here hates her but me. And I LIKED her til she > > > called me a plagiarist and a trouble maker. I may be a > > > trouble maker, but I sure as hell didnt plagiarize > > > anything. > > > > > > That and she ignored what I was saying to get her vendetta > > > out in the open against Steinman fans. > > > > > > > > > > > > > What has she done to people? I'm just curious. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | The SHOTish version... - LordRahl 02:20 pm UTC 10/24/07 |
| Next: | re: The SHOTish version... - LordRahl 02:44 pm UTC 10/25/07 |
| Thread: |
|