HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: The SHOTish version...

Posted by:
LordRahl 02:44 pm UTC 10/25/07
In reply to: re: The SHOTish version... - Pudding 10:16 pm UTC 10/24/07

Agreed. I even told her that I understand she is defending her Papa and that I was just trying to share info and give my opinion, not start trouble and that I liked her Dad and Jim equally. I guess she just took it a bit more personal than I would have thought.

Either way the past is the past and the Meat Loaf fans of the net are always going to come off as jerks to me now.

> You can't blame Amanda for defending her Dad, even if she
> is/was wrong.
>
> I know what you mean about some Pro-Loafers though, they
> jump on the fucking bandwagon at the drop of an hat or a
> red hankie, absolutely no self-respect some of them.
>
> > Man Pudding, I posted about this a million times.
> >
> > Ill give you the short version. If you want the more in
> > depth one there is a post I did somewhere in one of Eggs
> > things about this (where milton obviously found my
> > original statements)
> >
> > Anyways when the AP started telling about the Jim/Meat Bat
> > out of Hell 3 name fiasco I posted an article as well as
> > my thoughts on the situation on a Myspace forum. Right
> > after posting it Amanda responded with saying that the
> > fight is no ones business but her fathers and Jims and
> > that I didnt even post the real article.
> >
> > Everything went crazy from there since it was almost all
> > pro Meat Loaf fans saying I was disrespecting Amanda (the
> > biggest thing to upset me was I posted a link to my source
> > and no one even bothered to look at it). That and they
> > all came off as a bunch of know it alls and jerks (as many
> > of you know from the UK forum I guess, I wont even touch
> > that place with a thirty three and a half foot pole).
> >
> > Oh and my opinion I spent a while trying to word properly
> > so these mongoloids would see where I was coming from was
> > also completely ignored. I feel this happened because
> > the idiots chose to argue with me in the hopes they could
> > be Amanda's buddy and thus meet Meat.
> >
> > My opinion went something like this:
> >
> > "How would you guys feel if Jim released an album called
> > Bat out of Hell 3 that only had Meat singing a few songs
> > and the rest by all new people? That wouldn't feel like a
> > Bat out of Hell to me either. I think the same is being
> > done here but with Meat taking advantage."
> >
> > There is a link to the whole argument in one of my posts
> > down the page a bit and you can read the madness though it
> > is over a year old and since some of the people involved
> > have since deleted their accounts there are references and
> > quotes of people whose posts cant be read. As well as
> > some facts that ended up being changed after the actual
> > release of the album (I think i quoted the wrong number of
> > Jim songs or something).
> >
> > I hope that clears it up, and while it is alot I just
> > wrote, that really is the SHORT version. It is probably
> > best to leave it all in the past and just know that I dont
> > get along well with Amanda, not that anyone else should
> > feel that way. Just my own personal experience with her.
> >
> > A.G.
> >
> >
> >
> > > I might aswell jump in feet first and say "WHAT THE HELL
> > > ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?"
> > >
> > > > Nobody here hates her but me. And I LIKED her til she
> > > > called me a plagiarist and a trouble maker. I may be a
> > > > trouble maker, but I sure as hell didnt plagiarize
> > > > anything.
> > > >
> > > > That and she ignored what I was saying to get her vendetta
> > > > out in the open against Steinman fans.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > What has she done to people? I'm just curious.


reply |

Previous: re: The SHOTish version... - Pudding 10:16 pm UTC 10/24/07
Next: re: The SHOTish version... - Pudding 07:59 pm UTC 10/25/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE