HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: NJC - Newcomers

Posted by:
sturse 08:01 pm UTC 12/04/07
In reply to: NJC - Newcomers - Klasien 07:16 pm UTC 12/04/07

I'm just saying that if written rules were posted there we could avoid having to give ample warning. Plus, if there's only unwritten rules, then JD gets to pick and choose what she enforces, when she enforces, and who she enforces it agaist. I'm not suggesting she ban pudding for his actions, but he wrongfully attacked a member of this board, made allegations as to their identity, and pretty much kept kicking a dead horse, even in the face of WRITTEN fact.

If there were rules and rulekeepers (ie moderators) then perhaps Shallah would not have even seen Puddings post b/c it would have been deleted and we could have had a discussion about Steinman related topics instead of board politics as usual.

> Hey...
>
> Perhaps we can go a bit easy on the newcomers? Not all of
> them are (potential) Susan(s) or MR Egg....?
>
> As far as I am concerned, Shallah posted an honest and
> fair question. In fact I have been wondering the same
> thing for a while now, but because of all the bantering
> and slashing here... I decided against posting anything.
>
> Shallah... Welcome to the Rockman, it is nice to have a
> bit of fresh air here.
>
> Oh and Sturse, I do not think you do JD or the board
> justice when you sum it up like that. There sure are
> (unwritten) rules here... and both Smeg and Susan received
> ample warning before being banned.
>
> Pud, give up the police work and go back to being the
> resident prick?? Suits you better and is much more
> amusing!!
>
> Klasien


reply |

Previous: re: NJC - Newcomers - Shallah 10:39 pm UTC 12/04/07
Next: re: NJC - Newcomers - Klasien 08:04 pm UTC 12/04/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE