re: NJC - Newcomers | |
Posted by: ![]() |
Klasien 08:04 pm UTC 12/04/07 |
In reply to: | re: NJC - Newcomers - sturse 08:01 pm UTC 12/04/07 |
Granted, it would be nice if we could discuss more than board politics... K. > I'm just saying that if written rules were posted there we > could avoid having to give ample warning. Plus, if there's > only unwritten rules, then JD gets to pick and choose what > she enforces, when she enforces, and who she enforces it > agaist. I'm not suggesting she ban pudding for his > actions, but he wrongfully attacked a member of this > board, made allegations as to their identity, and pretty > much kept kicking a dead horse, even in the face of > WRITTEN fact. > > If there were rules and rulekeepers (ie moderators) then > perhaps Shallah would not have even seen Puddings post b/c > it would have been deleted and we could have had a > discussion about Steinman related topics instead of board > politics as usual. > > > Hey... > > > > Perhaps we can go a bit easy on the newcomers? Not all of > > them are (potential) Susan(s) or MR Egg....? > > > > As far as I am concerned, Shallah posted an honest and > > fair question. In fact I have been wondering the same > > thing for a while now, but because of all the bantering > > and slashing here... I decided against posting anything. > > > > Shallah... Welcome to the Rockman, it is nice to have a > > bit of fresh air here. > > > > Oh and Sturse, I do not think you do JD or the board > > justice when you sum it up like that. There sure are > > (unwritten) rules here... and both Smeg and Susan received > > ample warning before being banned. > > > > Pud, give up the police work and go back to being the > > resident prick?? Suits you better and is much more > > amusing!! > > > > Klasien | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: NJC - Newcomers - sturse 08:01 pm UTC 12/04/07 |
Next: | re: NJC - Newcomers - Pudding 09:45 pm UTC 12/04/07 |
Thread: |
|