| re: An example of this Neverland thing/argument | |
|
Posted by: |
Jsteinfan 12:14 pm UTC 04/30/08 |
| In reply to: | re: An example of this Neverland thing/argument - Pudding 07:08 am UTC 04/30/08 |
| Rent = la boheme I totally Agree w/ Pud and Ry on this. Wow. must be a full moon > Also West Side Story is based on Romeo & Juliet, and Kiss > Me Kate is inspired by Taming Of The Shrew, without ever > advertising the fact, people figured it out. > > > "The Lion King" is "Hamlet" but it's not advertised as > > "Hamlet". "Bat Out Of Hell" is "Peter Pan" but it's not > > advertised as "Peter Pan". It's advertised as "Bat Out Of > > Hell". The story is original enough and unique to Jim's > > vision that a) you don't have to call it "Bat Out Of Hell: > > Adventures In Neverland" and b) The audience will figure > > it out on their own. I think most connoisseurs of the "Bat > > Out Of Hell" albums realize that it was originally > > intended as a Neverland musical. I haven't seen one > > history book that's failed to mention this. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: An example of this Neverland thing/argument - Pudding 07:08 am UTC 04/30/08 |
| Next: | re: An example of this Neverland thing/argument - Smeghead 10:20 pm UTC 04/30/08 |
| Thread: |
|