| re: Is there an opening to generate huge publicity ? |
|
Posted by:
 |
wenners 05:44 pm UTC 06/03/08 |
| In reply to: |
re: Is there an opening to generate huge publicity ? - Smeghead 10:40 pm UTC 06/02/08 |
|
You obviously have a very high opinion of yourself if you feel your need to make a correction to my grammar would have any profound effect on me.
All it shows is your ignorance to the fact that nobody really gives a rat’s arse.
But feel free to point out if you see any further spelling mistakes or grammatical errors and also feel free to post your address so I can send you a dime for you to call someone who actually gives a fuck.
>
>
> > wow ill be able to sleep tonight thank you,
>
> Sorry if a little education rubs you the wrong way.
> >
> >
> >
> > > Just for your enlightenment, the word is albeit not "all
> > > be it"
> > >
> > > > Not being a huge fan of all these talent shows that are
> > > > constantly on our screens,whether you like them or not
> > > > they do succeed in producing huge publicity and also
> > > > create a star, All be it in a lot of cases short lived.
> > > > With all the talk of Andrew Lloyd Webber taking a
> > > > sabbatical to do phantom part deux or even even not
> > > > returning in the future at all is there an opportunity
> > > > for some one else to proceed over the proceedings and
> > > > replace Lord Webber, perhaps the Lord of Excess Mr
> > > > Steinman?
> > > >
> > > > Maybe the preparations for Bat the musical is not far
> > > > enough down the road, but what a great opportunity to
> > > > create public interest
> > > >
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Is there an opening to generate huge publicity ? - Smeghead 10:40 pm UTC 06/02/08 |
| Next: |
re: Is there an opening to generate huge publicity ? - Smeghead 10:46 am UTC 06/04/08 |
|
| Thread: |
|