Disclaimer: I'm just going to be a pain in the ass now.
> Roy Thomas Baker (just in
> case you didn't know) did "A Night At The Opera" for
> Queen, which is the only album that has come close to
> achieving what "Bat Out Of Hell" did (and vice versa)
That makes no sense on multiple levels. The most obvious being that Opera was released in '75.
> (instead, they'd be rolling around in Dante's Inferno in
> the ninth circle of hell?)
Ok, I get it. You don't like Bat III much. But what have the songs on Bat III to do with the 9th level of Dante's hell? Nothing. According to Dante, the 9th level is divided in 4 zones, where betrayers of family, political traitors, betrayers of guests, betrayers of lords and benefactors are punished. Betrayers of God are punished by being chewed by Satan for eternity. As songs can't betray anything, as they're inanimate things at best, they have no place in the ninth level of hell. And sending objects to hell makes no sense at all. Hell, even hell makes no sense at all.
> I don't believe in "Made In Heaven" or any of the planned
> work with Paul Rodgers.
Since Made in Heaven certainly exists, as I have no doubt that the new Queen+Paul Rogers things does, there is no reason (not) to believe in it. You believe in something of which there is no proof of it's existence (the fabled 27 minute Paradise demo, Zeus, Thor, Allah, God, Vishnu, common sense, the fact that I'm smoking hot -- take your pick). You do not believe in things that are proven to exist. You may ignore their existence all you like, but belief has nothing to do with it.
So. Now that I'm done being obnoxious on a sunday morning, it's time for breakfast.
|
