not logged in
| re: Out of Court Settlement | |
Posted by:  |
Pudding 10:19 pm UTC 06/14/08 |
| In reply to: | re: Out of Court Settlement - Smeghead 06:09 pm UTC 06/14/08 |
| I can imagine Jim might have been offered a fantastic production deal based on the sales of the previous two Bats. But it would've been a sales based deal and not a cash upfont deal, which is a bit of a gamble. > Ryan claimed that Meat told him that Jim was offered the > amazing producing deal (I don't believe it for one second. > If there was that much money involved Jim would have done > it.) > > As as I can tell there was no money offered Jim in the out > of court settlement. Just an agreement that Meat could > use the title for Bat 3 and for no future records. That > Jim could use it for his musical. That was it. AFAIK. > > > On that note: > > > > It was often reported (perhaps erroneously—who knows) that > > Jim was offered the biggest monetary value for a producing > > gig ever. > > > > Well... I wonder if after the out of court settlement he > > is now the happy recipient of the biggest monetary value > > for a sit back on your arse and DON'T produce anything > > gig? > > > > And on a strenuously related note, some unwarranted > > conspiracy theorising goes thusly: > > > > I wonder if after Desmond and his cast of thousands' cut, > > and after Jim Steinman's out of court settlement cut > > (which must surely exist, and in fairly hefty proportions > > on??) TMiL made any money whatsoever, cause it can pretty > > much be considered a commercial flop given its overhead!? > > > > Might that be why he's headed back to make Bull In A China > > shop so quickly? > > > > > > > > > > > This is old news since they settled out of court long > > > ago... > > > > > > > Copyright issues - worth a look | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Out of Court Settlement - rockfenris2005 02:05 am UTC 06/17/08 |
| Next: | re: Out of Court Settlement - rockfenris2005 03:57 am UTC 06/15/08 |
| Thread: |
|