not logged in
| re: Out of Court Settlement | |
Posted by:  |
Smeghead 06:09 pm UTC 06/14/08 |
| In reply to: | re: Out of Court Settlement - Wilbury 05:59 am UTC 06/14/08 |
| Ryan claimed that Meat told him that Jim was offered the amazing producing deal (I don't believe it for one second. If there was that much money involved Jim would have done it.) As as I can tell there was no money offered Jim in the out of court settlement. Just an agreement that Meat could use the title for Bat 3 and for no future records. That Jim could use it for his musical. That was it. AFAIK. > On that note: > > It was often reported (perhaps erroneously—who knows) that > Jim was offered the biggest monetary value for a producing > gig ever. > > Well... I wonder if after the out of court settlement he > is now the happy recipient of the biggest monetary value > for a sit back on your arse and DON'T produce anything > gig? > > And on a strenuously related note, some unwarranted > conspiracy theorising goes thusly: > > I wonder if after Desmond and his cast of thousands' cut, > and after Jim Steinman's out of court settlement cut > (which must surely exist, and in fairly hefty proportions > on??) TMiL made any money whatsoever, cause it can pretty > much be considered a commercial flop given its overhead!? > > Might that be why he's headed back to make Bull In A China > shop so quickly? > > > > > > This is old news since they settled out of court long > > ago... > > > > > Copyright issues - worth a look | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Out of Court Settlement - Wilbury 04:38 am UTC 06/15/08 |
| Next: | re: Out of Court Settlement - rockfenris2005 03:48 am UTC 06/15/08 |
| Thread: |
|