| re: Bull In A China Shop | |
|
Posted by: |
rockfenris2005 11:12 am UTC 06/19/08 |
| In reply to: | re: Bull In A China Shop - Wilbury 08:38 am UTC 06/19/08 |
What are you saying? Desmond Child should have been put aside so James Michael could contribute more to TMIL (What they call Bat 3?) Are you nuts? Desmond Child and the whole zoo should have been put aside for all Steinman material. > I really think Meat did James Michael a HUGE dis-service > in putting him aside, in essence, in favour of the output > of the Desmond machine. In my opinion the failure > (critically, financially, whatever) of the Desmond > decision is already pretty clear, but I think history will > make it especially obvious. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Bull In A China Shop - Wilbury 08:38 am UTC 06/19/08 |
| Next: | Hey Ryan - EvilNickname 11:32 am UTC 06/19/08 |
| Thread: |
|