| re: The Dark Knight | |
|
Posted by: |
samurai7 01:49 am UTC 08/16/08 |
| In reply to: | re: The Dark Knight - Conas 10:38 pm UTC 08/15/08 |
| so if you were a super hero and didn't want your identity discovered, you'd use your normal voice? I doubt it. > I seen the new Batman, and I don't know what all the hype > is about. It's a "good" film but it's certainly not > fantastic or a "Classic" as some critics say it is. > > Heath Ledger saved the show as the Joker. Christian Bale > gave an average display as Batman, and the voice Batman > had through out the film was dreadful. It was as if he was > dying of lung cancer. I mean WTF was with the voice? > Anyone who seen the film care to comment? > > > > > > I still haven't seen the new film, but is it really much > > darker than Burton's? That would be saying something. > > In any case, Jim can do dark just fine. Its not like his > > Batman demos are better suited for Adam West than > > Christian Bale. > > > > > Because Rinkoff did so well at getting the Dream Engine > > > off the ground. Jim really should just hire a manager who > > > knows what he is doing! > > > > > > Though the WB execs would probably want a whole new Batman > > > that is Darker like the movies now and not based on the > > > Burton Batman. > > > > > > > That's a good point. If Sonnenberg isn't working to make > > > > Batman happen than Rinkoff should take over and just pitch > > > > it himself! > > > > > > > > -=John Galt=- > > > > > > > > > Thought Question: > > > > > > > > > > Given the phenomenal success of this movie, is it > > > > > conceivable that there isn't at least ONE money-grubbing > > > > > executive over at Warner Bros. who ISN'T thinking about > > > > > reviving the Batman musical project? > > > > > > > > > > I don't think it is. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: The Dark Knight - Pudding 03:49 am UTC 08/16/08 |
| Next: | re: The Dark Knight - Conas 08:16 pm UTC 08/16/08 |
| Thread: |
|