HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: The Dark Knight

Posted by:
Conas 10:38 pm UTC 08/15/08
In reply to: re: The Dark Knight - Vin 07:06 pm UTC 08/15/08

I seen the new Batman, and I don't know what all the hype is about. It's a "good" film but it's certainly not fantastic or a "Classic" as some critics say it is.

Heath Ledger saved the show as the Joker. Christian Bale gave an average display as Batman, and the voice Batman had through out the film was dreadful. It was as if he was dying of lung cancer. I mean WTF was with the voice? Anyone who seen the film care to comment?




> I still haven't seen the new film, but is it really much
> darker than Burton's? That would be saying something.
> In any case, Jim can do dark just fine. Its not like his
> Batman demos are better suited for Adam West than
> Christian Bale.
>
> > Because Rinkoff did so well at getting the Dream Engine
> > off the ground. Jim really should just hire a manager who
> > knows what he is doing!
> >
> > Though the WB execs would probably want a whole new Batman
> > that is Darker like the movies now and not based on the
> > Burton Batman.
> >
> > > That's a good point. If Sonnenberg isn't working to make
> > > Batman happen than Rinkoff should take over and just pitch
> > > it himself!
> > >
> > > -=John Galt=-
> > >
> > > > Thought Question:
> > > >
> > > > Given the phenomenal success of this movie, is it
> > > > conceivable that there isn't at least ONE money-grubbing
> > > > executive over at Warner Bros. who ISN'T thinking about
> > > > reviving the Batman musical project?
> > > >
> > > > I don't think it is.


reply |

Previous: re: The Dark Knight - John_Galt 07:27 am UTC 08/18/08
Next: re: The Dark Knight - Pudding 03:49 am UTC 08/16/08

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE