HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again)

Posted by:
Smeghead 11:14 am UTC 08/18/08
In reply to: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Pudding 04:42 am UTC 08/18/08

Hmmm... Jim, Rob, Elaine, Bonnie and the rest all did that for free and for more than a few minutes.

> Good question...LOL
>
> I know some people paid £150 just to see him for a few
> minutes, shake his hand and have a picture taken on this
> last tour.
>
> > To see him do what?
> > > > The fact that he continues to tour, with diminishing vocal
> > > > returns, at more & more shows, means he's 'taking the
> > > > piss' to a certain extent, and not giving value for
> > > > money.
> > >
> > > Value for money...hmmm...now there's an interesting
> > > thought. Who can say what is or isn't value for money?
> > >
> > > How much would you be willing to pay to see Meat Loaf?


reply |

Previous: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Pudding 04:42 am UTC 08/18/08
Next: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Macahan 04:08 pm UTC 08/17/08

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE