re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) | |
Posted by: ![]() |
Smeghead 11:14 am UTC 08/18/08 |
In reply to: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Pudding 04:42 am UTC 08/18/08 |
Hmmm... Jim, Rob, Elaine, Bonnie and the rest all did that for free and for more than a few minutes. > Good question...LOL > > I know some people paid £150 just to see him for a few > minutes, shake his hand and have a picture taken on this > last tour. > > > To see him do what? > > > > The fact that he continues to tour, with diminishing vocal > > > > returns, at more & more shows, means he's 'taking the > > > > piss' to a certain extent, and not giving value for > > > > money. > > > > > > Value for money...hmmm...now there's an interesting > > > thought. Who can say what is or isn't value for money? > > > > > > How much would you be willing to pay to see Meat Loaf? | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Pudding 04:42 am UTC 08/18/08 |
Next: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Macahan 04:08 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
Thread: |