| re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) |
|
Posted by:
 |
Pudding 04:42 am UTC 08/18/08 |
| In reply to: |
re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Smeghead 10:39 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
|
Good question...LOL
I know some people paid £150 just to see him for a few minutes, shake his hand and have a picture taken on this last tour.
> To see him do what?
> > > The fact that he continues to tour, with diminishing vocal
> > > returns, at more & more shows, means he's 'taking the
> > > piss' to a certain extent, and not giving value for
> > > money.
> >
> > Value for money...hmmm...now there's an interesting
> > thought. Who can say what is or isn't value for money?
> >
> > How much would you be willing to pay to see Meat Loaf?
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Smeghead 10:39 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
| Next: |
re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Smeghead 11:14 am UTC 08/18/08 |
|
| Thread: |
|