HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again)

Posted by:
Macahan 03:37 pm UTC 08/18/08
In reply to: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Rob 10:39 pm UTC 08/17/08

Unless you were present at the show you can't possibly tell me that I was warned about this. I know Meat can't sing anymore, but I could never have imagined what I witnessed at saturdays show. It was unbelivable.

> What amazes me is that members of this board, who
> obviously know what shape Meat is in these days, continue
> to pay out good money to see him.
>
> I saw him on the 3 Bats tour and I can safely say I would
> not bother to see him again, unless I heard reliable info
> that his voice had improved over a long period, rather
> than the odd show that he seems to be able to pull out now
> & then.
>
> I certainly wouldn't bother to go see him and then post a
> shocked review on here. It's not like people haven't been
> warned.
>
> > > The fact that he continues to tour, with diminishing vocal
> > > returns, at more & more shows, means he's 'taking the
> > > piss' to a certain extent, and not giving value for
> > > money.
> >
> > Value for money...hmmm...now there's an interesting
> > thought. Who can say what is or isn't value for money?
> >
> > How much would you be willing to pay to see Meat Loaf?


reply |

Previous: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Rob 10:39 pm UTC 08/17/08
Next: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Smeghead 11:34 am UTC 08/22/08

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE