re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) | |
Posted by: ![]() |
Smeghead 11:34 am UTC 08/22/08 |
In reply to: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Macahan 03:37 pm UTC 08/18/08 |
Anybody on this forum has been warned by me ad anseum. But apparently my work is not done! > Unless you were present at the show you can't possibly > tell me that I was warned about this. I know Meat can't > sing anymore, but I could never have imagined what I > witnessed at saturdays show. It was unbelivable. > > > What amazes me is that members of this board, who > > obviously know what shape Meat is in these days, continue > > to pay out good money to see him. > > > > I saw him on the 3 Bats tour and I can safely say I would > > not bother to see him again, unless I heard reliable info > > that his voice had improved over a long period, rather > > than the odd show that he seems to be able to pull out now > > & then. > > > > I certainly wouldn't bother to go see him and then post a > > shocked review on here. It's not like people haven't been > > warned. > > > > > > The fact that he continues to tour, with diminishing vocal > > > > returns, at more & more shows, means he's 'taking the > > > > piss' to a certain extent, and not giving value for > > > > money. > > > > > > Value for money...hmmm...now there's an interesting > > > thought. Who can say what is or isn't value for money? > > > > > > How much would you be willing to pay to see Meat Loaf? | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Macahan 03:37 pm UTC 08/18/08 |
Next: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Smeghead 10:39 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
Thread: |