HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again)

Posted by:
Smeghead 11:34 am UTC 08/22/08
In reply to: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Macahan 03:37 pm UTC 08/18/08

Anybody on this forum has been warned by me ad anseum. But apparently my work is not done!

> Unless you were present at the show you can't possibly
> tell me that I was warned about this. I know Meat can't
> sing anymore, but I could never have imagined what I
> witnessed at saturdays show. It was unbelivable.
>
> > What amazes me is that members of this board, who
> > obviously know what shape Meat is in these days, continue
> > to pay out good money to see him.
> >
> > I saw him on the 3 Bats tour and I can safely say I would
> > not bother to see him again, unless I heard reliable info
> > that his voice had improved over a long period, rather
> > than the odd show that he seems to be able to pull out now
> > & then.
> >
> > I certainly wouldn't bother to go see him and then post a
> > shocked review on here. It's not like people haven't been
> > warned.
> >
> > > > The fact that he continues to tour, with diminishing vocal
> > > > returns, at more & more shows, means he's 'taking the
> > > > piss' to a certain extent, and not giving value for
> > > > money.
> > >
> > > Value for money...hmmm...now there's an interesting
> > > thought. Who can say what is or isn't value for money?
> > >
> > > How much would you be willing to pay to see Meat Loaf?


reply |

Previous: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Macahan 03:37 pm UTC 08/18/08
Next: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Smeghead 10:39 pm UTC 08/17/08

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE