re: BOOHM Preceptions | |
Posted by: |
lotus_nz 04:33 am UTC 08/29/08 |
In reply to: | re: BOOHM Preceptions - Pudding 08:06 pm UTC 08/28/08 |
> > > > > > > > > Riiight. > > > > > > So Jim would rather have another huge flop with his name > > > associated to it, than have a huge hit where Meat's name > > > might be bandied about as the guy who sang most of the > > > songs originally. > > > > > > That makes sense. > > Meat claims that during the Bat 1 tour Jim claimed he > > hated Meat because he got all the recognition. I can only > > imagine how it must feel for Jim to have more than half > > the world think Meat Loaf wrote the songs to Bat 1 and > > 2... and then for Meat to claim he wrote most of the > > lyrics and music as well. > > Yes it must be painful for Jim and he probably cries into > his pillow almost daily at the very thought. But what > would be worse for Jim, people thinking Meat Loaf wrote > Bat1+2 (which the general public probably don't give two > fucks about) or people thinking Jim is a complete daft > cunt for not using Meat Loaf to help promote the musical? or people thinking Jim is a complete daft cunt for not using Meat Loaf to help promote the musical?----wise words my pudd wise words indeed. | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: BOOHM Preceptions - Pudding 08:06 pm UTC 08/28/08 |
Next: | re: BOOHM Preceptions - Smeghead 11:58 pm UTC 08/28/08 |
Thread: |