HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: BOOHM Preceptions

Posted by:
lotus_nz 04:33 am UTC 08/29/08
In reply to: re: BOOHM Preceptions - Pudding 08:06 pm UTC 08/28/08



>
>
> >
> >
> > > Riiight.
> > >
> > > So Jim would rather have another huge flop with his name
> > > associated to it, than have a huge hit where Meat's name
> > > might be bandied about as the guy who sang most of the
> > > songs originally.
> > >
> > > That makes sense.
> > Meat claims that during the Bat 1 tour Jim claimed he
> > hated Meat because he got all the recognition. I can only
> > imagine how it must feel for Jim to have more than half
> > the world think Meat Loaf wrote the songs to Bat 1 and
> > 2... and then for Meat to claim he wrote most of the
> > lyrics and music as well.
>
> Yes it must be painful for Jim and he probably cries into
> his pillow almost daily at the very thought. But what
> would be worse for Jim, people thinking Meat Loaf wrote
> Bat1+2 (which the general public probably don't give two
> fucks about) or people thinking Jim is a complete daft
> cunt for not using Meat Loaf to help promote the musical?


or people thinking Jim is a complete daft cunt for not using Meat Loaf to help promote the musical?----wise words my pudd wise words indeed.





reply |

Previous: re: BOOHM Preceptions - Pudding 08:06 pm UTC 08/28/08
Next: re: BOOHM Preceptions - Smeghead 11:58 pm UTC 08/28/08

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE