HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: BOOHM Preceptions

Posted by:
Pudding 08:06 pm UTC 08/28/08
In reply to: re: BOOHM Preceptions - Smeghead 04:59 pm UTC 08/28/08



>
>
> > Riiight.
> >
> > So Jim would rather have another huge flop with his name
> > associated to it, than have a huge hit where Meat's name
> > might be bandied about as the guy who sang most of the
> > songs originally.
> >
> > That makes sense.
> Meat claims that during the Bat 1 tour Jim claimed he
> hated Meat because he got all the recognition. I can only
> imagine how it must feel for Jim to have more than half
> the world think Meat Loaf wrote the songs to Bat 1 and
> 2... and then for Meat to claim he wrote most of the
> lyrics and music as well.

Yes it must be painful for Jim and he probably cries into his pillow almost daily at the very thought. But what would be worse for Jim, people thinking Meat Loaf wrote Bat1+2 (which the general public probably don't give two fucks about) or people thinking Jim is a complete daft cunt for not using Meat Loaf to help promote the musical?


reply |

Previous: re: BOOHM Preceptions - Smeghead 04:52 pm UTC 08/29/08
Next: re: BOOHM Preceptions - lotus_nz 04:33 am UTC 08/29/08

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE