re: A serious question to all the blindly Loyal Loafers | |
Posted by: ![]() |
Smeghead 10:00 am UTC 09/01/08 |
In reply to: | re: A serious question to all the blindly Loyal Loafers - Pudding 12:42 am UTC 09/01/08 |
We'll see. I know Jim doesn't want Meat associated with it. I know Rink doesn't. We'll see. If they do have Meat involved I know it will be a mistake. either way I'm sure I'll be proven right in the end. > Get over yourself Smeg. Meat Loaf's going to be associated > with the musical no matter what fucked up theories you've > got running around your head. > > The public aint gonna give two shits what original musical > some of the music came from, they're not gonna give two > shits that it's based on Peter Pan either. It'll be a > simple no-brainer for them, the music from Meat Loaf's > Bat1 + Bat2 is in a musical. We Will Rock You, Mamma Mia > etc are shit storylines but the music is the big draw. > > > > Just because Jim chose to call it Bat Out Of Hell does not > > mean he has to involve Loaf in some way. All he has to do > > is every time the stupid press asks where Meat is or who > > is playing Meat or whatever dumb ass question they ask he > > says "The musical has nothing to do with Meat Loaf. The > > musical is based on the Peter Pan legend, only the Lost > > Boys are eternal Teenagers, not children. The Musical in > > its original form was written prior to Meat Loaf recording > > Bat Out Of Hell. Meat did not appear in the original > > musical and he does not appear in this re-imagined version > > either. I wish him all the best with his current album > > and tour." > > > > > > > Unfortunately Jim is afraid the show won't > > > > sail on its own merrits. > > > > > > You've answered your own question there. > > > > > > Jim decided to call the musical Bat out of Hell to ride on > > > the back of that album's name and its success. That's why > > > he now has to deal with the Meat Loaf problem and involve > > > him in some way. He set the expectations, not the press or > > > any of us on this board. | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: A serious question to all the blindly Loyal Loafers - Pudding 12:42 am UTC 09/01/08 |
Next: | re: A serious question to all the blindly Loyal Loafers - Pudding 09:39 pm UTC 09/01/08 |
Thread: |
|