not logged in
| re: A serious question to all the blindly Loyal Loafers | |
Posted by:  |
Pudding 12:42 am UTC 09/01/08 |
| In reply to: | re: A serious question to all the blindly Loyal Loafers - Smeghead 06:50 pm UTC 08/29/08 |
| Get over yourself Smeg. Meat Loaf's going to be associated with the musical no matter what fucked up theories you've got running around your head. The public aint gonna give two shits what original musical some of the music came from, they're not gonna give two shits that it's based on Peter Pan either. It'll be a simple no-brainer for them, the music from Meat Loaf's Bat1 + Bat2 is in a musical. We Will Rock You, Mamma Mia etc are shit storylines but the music is the big draw. > Just because Jim chose to call it Bat Out Of Hell does not > mean he has to involve Loaf in some way. All he has to do > is every time the stupid press asks where Meat is or who > is playing Meat or whatever dumb ass question they ask he > says "The musical has nothing to do with Meat Loaf. The > musical is based on the Peter Pan legend, only the Lost > Boys are eternal Teenagers, not children. The Musical in > its original form was written prior to Meat Loaf recording > Bat Out Of Hell. Meat did not appear in the original > musical and he does not appear in this re-imagined version > either. I wish him all the best with his current album > and tour." > > > > > Unfortunately Jim is afraid the show won't > > > sail on its own merrits. > > > > You've answered your own question there. > > > > Jim decided to call the musical Bat out of Hell to ride on > > the back of that album's name and its success. That's why > > he now has to deal with the Meat Loaf problem and involve > > him in some way. He set the expectations, not the press or > > any of us on this board. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: A serious question to all the blindly Loyal Loafers - Smeghead 06:50 pm UTC 08/29/08 |
| Next: | re: A serious question to all the blindly Loyal Loafers - Smeghead 10:00 am UTC 09/01/08 |
| Thread: |
|