| re: Now, Smeg..... | |
|
Posted by: |
Jsteinfan 09:18 pm UTC 09/08/08 |
| In reply to: | re: Now, Smeg..... - Smeghead 08:46 pm UTC 09/08/08 |
| This for one: http://northshorejournal.org/loser-says-palin-banned-books i used to be the biggest liberal until i was employed liberal administration. I still am... i would hate repb's if i were employed by them.... right now.. it is important for me to keep my money in my pocket..cause i know best how to spend it for my benefit. That is why i will vote for mccain. I agree w/ ann and will not debate w/ steinfans. perhaps when i am financially secure and retired i will see things differently. Politics is a cycle... ideals and youth = democrat selfish and $$ = republican Dying and regretful = Democrat haha -Justin who is open to many views > I did Google the story and could only find articles > confirming it. Please point me to the Other Side as I'd > love to read it! > > > > > You are way too smart to take one article sent from a > > leftie, even Ray, and believe it. > > > > Just google Sarah Palin, and banned books, and you will > > find the other side of the story. > > > > Also that MySpace page that hit the news was a fake. It > > was set up just the day before and contained inflammatory > > language written deliberately to provoke the negative > > reaction. > > > > I just will NOT argue politics with my Steinfriends. They > > are way on the other side of the spectrum from me. I am > > not going to change their minds and they are not going to > > change mine. > > > > Most of us are already set in our beliefs etc. and arguing > > will not change minds. We just have two sides in foxholes > > lobbing grenades at each other. Not very productive. > > > > My hope is that those in the US who plan to vote, will > > inform themselves and choose to vote for whomever they see > > as being the best for the country regardless of party. > > > > I am not really thrilled with any of the candidates this > > year and am not happy to once again have to choose who I > > perceive to be the less harmful of the two. > > > > Ann | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Now, Smeg..... - Ann 10:13 pm UTC 09/08/08 |
| Next: | re: Now, Smeg..... - Pudding 10:06 pm UTC 09/08/08 |
| Thread: |
|