| re: "NO REASON Meat couldnt sing these too" | |
|
Posted by: |
samurai7 03:39 pm UTC 09/09/08 |
| In reply to: | "NO REASON Meat couldnt sing these too" - Vin 02:57 pm UTC 09/09/08 |
| I personally would love there to be at least one more Meat song in this concept. But the production would have to be solely in Jim/Rink's hands. None of this "5 takes and we'll edit the best parts" like on CHSIB or TMIL. It would have to be (as close to as is possible) perfect. And if that meant it taking 3 years like Bat II, then so be it. Probably the most surprisingly un-commented on thing Jim > could have said. Especially by Smeg, who I wager could > think of a reason or two. (not least of which is his > vocal chords, eh, Smeg?) > > So all doors remain open, I gather. Interesting times. > Would be pretty cool, I guess, to have a Bat Climax album > by Meat, for the Meat Heads and the completists, as an > off-shoot of the larger BooH musical, with the cast-album > as the "real deal" for the staunch anti-Loaf set. > > But then again, that would un-avoidably link the musical > with Meat, which is of course what is ostensibly trying to > be avoided after all these years. Wasn't that the point > of letting Meat do "Bat III," so he could finish molesting > the Bat name and Jim could finally attempt to reclaim it > for his own? > > Good arguments on both sides, I think. But in the end, > the more publicity Jim could get for the musical, most > likely the better. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: "NO REASON Meat couldnt sing these too" - Jsteinfan 07:48 pm UTC 09/09/08 |
| Next: | re: "NO REASON Meat couldnt sing these too" - ricgough 03:17 am UTC 09/17/08 |
| Thread: |
|