You really don't want to go down the road of twisting what I was saying.
I asked if SS was, I never said SS was. But if indeed SS is gay then perhaps SS feels homosexual individuals are being mistreated by the press more so than hetrosexuals. Elton John is a relatively decent bloke and well respected, George Michael wanked off in a public toilet and has been found slumped over a steering wheel stoned out of his tree a few times. Defending George Michael and they way he's been portrayed in the press I find a little puzzling to say the least. Especially when there's other celebrities who've been treated badly by the press and who've done nothing wrong at all, yet they never got mentioned. All I was trying to do is figure out SS's reasoning.
It has nothing to do with liking or disliking their music.
> So because he defends them, he's automatically gay? He
> can't, say, like their music, or better yet, think
> everyone deserves fairness?
>
> Pudding wrote:
> > I asked a question when you defended both Elton John and
> > George Michael who are both notoriously gay. If you are
> > gay then I could clearer understand your POV.
|
