not logged in
| re: People getting into arguments on this site... | |
Posted by:  |
wordnix 03:21 am UTC 09/24/08 |
| In reply to: | re: People getting into arguments on this site... - Pudding 03:00 am UTC 09/24/08 |
| I'm gay, and I don't feel that we're being mistreated by the predominantly heterosexual press at all. Let's face it, they've been fed stereotypes their entire lives, so for the foreseeable future, they're gonna put us down. Eventually, time will tell whether or not that changes. But this isn't about me after all, it's about SS. What I don't get is this. I'm not even trying to twist your words, it's just how it read to me. "If you are gay then I could clearer understand your POV." So he just happens to defend two gay celebrities...that makes him gay? That automatically means he's gay and thinks they're being victimized more than other celebrities? For all we know he's just a fan of their music, or they're the first two names that came to mind. (For the record, George Michael was deliberately baited in that restroom. An undercover cop pulled "come in the stall, you show yours, I'll show mine" and busted him--under American law that's now illegal as a result.) It's clear you're homophobic. It's no big issue, plenty of people are. But I'd appreciate if you didn't jump to conclusions and then attempt to justify it while you just dig yourself deeper in the process. > You really don't want to go down the road of twisting what > I was saying. > > I asked if SS was, I never said SS was. But if indeed SS > is gay then perhaps SS feels homosexual individuals are > being mistreated by the press more so than hetrosexuals. > Elton John is a relatively decent bloke and well > respected, George Michael wanked off in a public toilet > and has been found slumped over a steering wheel stoned > out of his tree a few times. Defending George Michael and > they way he's been portrayed in the press I find a little > puzzling to say the least. Especially when there's other > celebrities who've been treated badly by the press and > who've done nothing wrong at all, yet they never got > mentioned. All I was trying to do is figure out SS's > reasoning. > > It has nothing to do with liking or disliking their > music. > > > So because he defends them, he's automatically gay? He > > can't, say, like their music, or better yet, think > > everyone deserves fairness? > > > > Pudding wrote: > > > I asked a question when you defended both Elton John and > > > George Michael who are both notoriously gay. If you are > > > gay then I could clearer understand your POV. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: People getting into arguments on this site... - Pudding 03:00 am UTC 09/24/08 |
| Next: | re: People getting into arguments on this site... - Venom 06:12 am UTC 09/24/08 |
| Thread: |
|