not logged in
| re: Cosmos Rocks should not even exist | |
Posted by:  |
wordnix 04:23 pm UTC 10/04/08 |
| In reply to: | re: Cosmos Rocks should not even exist - rockfenris2005 04:13 pm UTC 10/04/08 |
| If by "years" you mean a few weeks now, then yeah. Why hide that we chat(ted) on MSN a lot? It doesn't mean you consider me a friend after all that shite, it means there was no one else to talk to, and as Pud might say, I "talked a good game". > > I haven't had a conversation with you in years. > > > Didn't we go over this? Queen and Queen + Paul > > Rodgers are two different entities that share a few > > members (and some songs in concert) in common. You can > > enjoy (or not enjoy) Queen + Paul Rodgers without > > it affecting anyone's memories of the real Queen. > > > > > > > > At least with the Queen name on it > > > > > > > > > > > > • Queen + Paul Rodgers' new one is a REAL grower, a > > > > > couple of real clunkers and some REAL shitty lyrics (which > > > > > I'm going to attribute to Mr Brian May for the most part > > > > > -- "the myths and the dragons of time will explode" wtf?) > > > > > are thankfully in the minority and Paul Rodger's voice is > > > > > capable of wonderful things I never knew. > > > > > > > > Why, Wilbury??? Why????? | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Cosmos Rocks should not even exist - rockfenris2005 04:13 pm UTC 10/04/08 |
| Next: | re: Cosmos Rocks should not even exist - rockfenris2005 04:27 pm UTC 10/04/08 |
| Thread: |
|