HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Cosmos Rocks should not even exist

Posted by:
rockfenris2005 04:27 pm UTC 10/04/08
In reply to: re: Cosmos Rocks should not even exist - wordnix 04:23 pm UTC 10/04/08


What, was that the time you told Alannah that mum and dad kicked me out of home and I was wandering the streets with syringes sticking out of my arms?

> If by "years" you mean a few weeks now, then yeah. Why
> hide that we chat(ted) on MSN a lot? It doesn't mean you
> consider me a friend after all that shite, it means there
> was no one else to talk to, and as Pud might say, I
> "talked a good game".
>
> >
> > I haven't had a conversation with you in years.
> >
> > > Didn't we go over this? Queen and Queen + Paul
> > > Rodgers
are two different entities that share a few
> > > members (and some songs in concert) in common. You can
> > > enjoy (or not enjoy) Queen + Paul Rodgers without
> > > it affecting anyone's memories of the real Queen.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > At least with the Queen name on it
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > • Queen + Paul Rodgers' new one is a REAL grower, a
> > > > > > couple of real clunkers and some REAL shitty lyrics (which
> > > > > > I'm going to attribute to Mr Brian May for the most part
> > > > > > -- "the myths and the dragons of time will explode" wtf?)
> > > > > > are thankfully in the minority and Paul Rodger's voice is
> > > > > > capable of wonderful things I never knew.
> > > > >
> > > > > Why, Wilbury??? Why?????


reply |

Previous: re: Cosmos Rocks should not even exist - wordnix 04:23 pm UTC 10/04/08
Next: Kids, why not using MSN again? - Markus 04:30 pm UTC 10/04/08

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE