| re: Cosmos Rocks should not even exist | |
|
Posted by: |
rockfenris2005 04:27 pm UTC 10/04/08 |
| In reply to: | re: Cosmos Rocks should not even exist - wordnix 04:23 pm UTC 10/04/08 |
What, was that the time you told Alannah that mum and dad kicked me out of home and I was wandering the streets with syringes sticking out of my arms? > If by "years" you mean a few weeks now, then yeah. Why > hide that we chat(ted) on MSN a lot? It doesn't mean you > consider me a friend after all that shite, it means there > was no one else to talk to, and as Pud might say, I > "talked a good game". > > > > > I haven't had a conversation with you in years. > > > > > Didn't we go over this? Queen and Queen + Paul > > > Rodgers are two different entities that share a few > > > members (and some songs in concert) in common. You can > > > enjoy (or not enjoy) Queen + Paul Rodgers without > > > it affecting anyone's memories of the real Queen. > > > > > > > > > > > At least with the Queen name on it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > • Queen + Paul Rodgers' new one is a REAL grower, a > > > > > > couple of real clunkers and some REAL shitty lyrics (which > > > > > > I'm going to attribute to Mr Brian May for the most part > > > > > > -- "the myths and the dragons of time will explode" wtf?) > > > > > > are thankfully in the minority and Paul Rodger's voice is > > > > > > capable of wonderful things I never knew. > > > > > > > > > > Why, Wilbury??? Why????? | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Cosmos Rocks should not even exist - wordnix 04:23 pm UTC 10/04/08 |
| Next: | Kids, why not using MSN again? - Markus 04:30 pm UTC 10/04/08 |
| Thread: |
|