...means absolutely nothing in the view of things. I'm just one of the 50 million who purchased "Bat Out Of Hell" and "Back Into Hell". But I think he's a bully and he hogs the spotlight. Starting in 1993 when history repeated itself and Jim should have been equally acknowledged for the success of Bat 2. It wasn't just a comeback album for Meat, it was a creative culmination of everyone of Jim's experiments 1983 through 1993!
Meat or his lawyers or whoever spews all this BS about creative contributions which is an absolute sack of dog fodder, suing Jim to the tune of $50 million ($100 million if you include Sonenberg and God knows who else.) and denying his chance in completing one of his most successful projects. Can you imagine, long long ago, if Hieronymus Bosch had a heart-attack and some hack was commissioned to complete his most famous paintings?
The whole TMIL thing, lawsuit and all, was just rude and conceited.
Then you have the stubbornness, possibly even ripping off your greatest fans because you can't realize you can't sing anymore. Hurting your friends, hurting your fans, alienating yourself more and more as the years go by...Why should I sit here and say "Oh, go easy on POOR. FAT. MARVIN. WHO. CAN'T. WEAR. LEVIS."
> > Medication? Now it's Vertigo?
>
> It was explained as vertigo from the start, so I don't see
> why everyone is making such a big thing about it.
>
> That piece is very mean-spirited and poorly written. Why
> wouldn;t Meat turn up to receive an award for a song that
> he recorded and is probably very proud of his part in? Is
> it his fault that the organisers didn't invite Jim? (Or
> Todd for that matter).
>
>
|
