| re: Meat writing Bat 1+2 claim evidence |
|
Posted by:
 |
Klasien 06:58 am UTC 10/11/08 |
| In reply to: |
Meat writing Bat 1+2 claim evidence - Pudding 01:11 am UTC 10/09/08 |
|
Now I could have sworn I heard or read a Meat interview on how Meat talks about Jim and Todd working together, and him just coming in to do his vocal tracks and not being part of any process at all...
I think it might have been in that biography book of Meat's... not sure which album this was for... but he sure said it somewhere...
K.
> Following on from a conversation below and just to prove
> Smeg (the bastard) right...yet again(curse him) this is
> Meats writing claim for Bat1 and Bat 2.
>
> Click link below for full court papers and it's on page 10
> of 17.
>
> The Plaintiff being Meat Loaf and the Defendant being Jim
>
> 12. The concept of the Bat Out Of Hell album resulted from
> a joint creative effort between Plaintiff and Defendant
> Steinman.
>
> 13. Plaintiff was the artist, singer and Performer for Bat
> Out Of Hell. His role included providing portions of the
> lyrics, as well as developing the overall presentation of
> the songs. Plaintiff performed all the songs on the album,
> and was and is the sole user of the BAT OUT OF HELL mark.
>
> 17. Following the success of Bat Out Of Hell 1, a Bat Out
> Of Hell 2 album was released in September 1993. Defendant
> Steinman wrote the songs and produced the album. Plaintiff
> provided most of the lyrics, singing, performing and
> developing the overall presentation of the songs.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
Meat writing Bat 1+2 claim evidence - Pudding 01:11 am UTC 10/09/08 |
| Next: |
re: Meat writing Bat 1+2 claim evidence - Wilbury 08:23 am UTC 10/11/08 |
|
| Thread: |
|