HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Sorry, Meat had his chance with The Final At Bat

Posted by:
tincrowdor 06:44 pm UTC 10/16/08
In reply to: re: Sorry, Meat had his chance with The Final At Bat - samurai7 12:03 am UTC 10/16/08

Good points. I wasn't factoring in the lawsuits. I think Meat would tour regardless. I don't think it's for the money. I think he stated in one interview that he was on tour practically all year and only saw his family for a few days. I think you maybe over estimating just how much a songwriter gets from a song. Anyway I think only the IRS would probably have an idea as to who is richest

> I'll guarantee that it's the other way around. Meat didn't
> make any (real) money from Bat 1, Dead Ringer and MATLAF
> because he was sued by Sony for breach of contract when he
> walked out mid-sessions for MATLAF. He was also sued by
> Steinman when he couldn't complete the recording of Bad
> For Good. Steinman, however, wrote all the songs on Bat 1,
> DR, Bat 2, half of TMIL, and had huge hits with Bonnie
> Tyler, Celine and others, plus his musicals, ie Whistle
> and Tanz. Steinman was also never stripped of his
> royalties from Bat and DR. I will bet you anything yo
> ulike that Steinman is FAR richer than Meat, and I'll also
> go so far as to say that the reason Meat still tours is
> because it's the only real income he has.
>
> Now I await the inevitable flaming, and accusations of
> being a loafer ;-)
>
> >
> > Interesting. I wonder who is richer? I would go for Meat
> > with the continuous album sales and a large amount from
> > non-Jim stuff and money through touring.
> >
> > > yeah, but how much BIGGER is Jim's sack full of money?
> > > ;-)
> > >
> > > > They're just two big little kids with huge egos, each with
> > > > a sack full of money and a sack full of pride. They have
> > > > no one to blame but themselves for how it turned out.
> > > > Discussing any alternate possibilities or potential
> > > > reunions is useless unless they actually happen.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > And Jim had been very ill also.
> > > > >
> > > > > > I think you are right. I believe this is wh Meat insists
> > > > > > that he is not going to spend years making an album. I'm
> > > > > > sure part of it is becuase he is supposed to hate the
> > > > > > studio work. I think his health is also a consideration
> > > > > > though, and wish he would stop so much touring as he
> > > > > > clearly hasn't been physically up to it in years however
> > > > > > you may feel about his voice. I would think he has enough
> > > > > > money that he could live pretty well without all the
> > > > > > strenous touring, even if he says he enjoys it, his health
> > > > > > should be a concern.
> > > > > > I wish he and Jim could reunite one more time for one
> > > > > > song. Meat can still do a passable studio vocal and they
> > > > > > could just do one song like you suggest so it wouldn't
> > > > > > take forever. Jim has "Body" done, it's a great song, and
> > > > > > probably pretty much ready to add vocals. In today's
> > > > > > marketI don't know how big a hit it could be, but the 2
> > > > > > reuniting would draw press for Jim's musical.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > ..and seeing how sick he is, it's painful to have to say
> > > > > > > that I think his time is running out. I really hope that
> > > > > > > Jim can at least do one more song with him, if not a whole
> > > > > > > album, to seal the bat circle the way it should have been
> > > > > > > done. I know that a lot of damage has been done, but it
> > > > > > > can't end this way. It needs to be Meat and Jim. Plus,
> > > > > > > this could very well help promote the Bat musical.


reply |

Previous: re: Sorry, Meat had his chance with The Final At Bat - samurai7 12:03 am UTC 10/16/08
Next: re: Having seen all the latest clips of Meat - batoutofhell77 01:07 pm UTC 10/10/08

Thread:



    HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE