not logged in
| Formal statement | |
Posted by:  |
wordnix 03:33 pm UTC 01/04/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Another note - wordnix 03:27 pm UTC 01/04/09 |
| Mr. Haase has never been involved in the production of any XXX venture as a director or producer. As a writer. particularly after a career which has been marked by literary work of the highest quality, Mr. Haase resents these attempts to slander him by purposely mis-characterizing an impeccable career by a single advertisement that was never answered. As a writer, Mr. Haase believes strongly in the first amendment--free speech, free thought--and will write whatever he pleases. Further, the proof of the slander is your posting an obscure ad which was never answered when examples of Mr. Haase's work abound on the Internet, including his best-selling cookbook, his AUDELCO-nominated production of Frederick Douglass, and his acclaimed production of Stephen Schwartz's Godspell in Harlem. Periodically, we investigate all side thoughts, ideas, etc., but Mr. Haase has never been actively involved in the direction or production of pornography and will sue anyone who calls him or implies him to be a pornographer, including you. > Again, to drill it into your head: > > Mr. Haase has NEVER directed or produced porno. As a very > young man in his 20s, he wrote an erotic screenplay as a > lark, for which he was not a member of the production > team. He has written and published numerous pieces of > high-end erotic fiction, of which he is not ashamed. The > vast majority of his career, the part YOU should be > focusing on, has been spent adapting classic literature to > mainstream media. > > P.S. In case you were curious, no one responded to that > ad. A pity, if you ask me...in the middle of a worldwide > depression, with a family to raise, in a desperate moment, > Mr. Haase entertained a thought that was never followed up > on, either by him or anyone else for that matter. > > > There is a distinct difference between porn and erotica. > > Erotica is like CALIGULA, acted, fictional and depicted. > > Porn is just a straight shot of sex. Richard develops a > > very large line of projects for potential buyers, from > > educational shows to religious shows to erotica, all > > genres depend on the buyer. Erotica is not porno. Imply > > he's a pornographer again, and he'll not only take you to > > court, he'll get the whole damn board shut down. > > > > > > hotprojects(at)nyc(dot)rr(dot)com > > > > > > I don't think I'll bother ... > > > > > > > > > him up" yourself matey > > > > > > Dave | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Another note - daveake 01:30 pm UTC 01/08/09 |
| Next: | re: Another note - rockfenris2005 03:26 pm UTC 01/04/09 |
| Thread: | |