| re: Another note | |
|
Posted by: |
daveake 01:30 pm UTC 01/08/09 |
| In reply to: | re: Another note - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 01:09 pm UTC 01/08/09 |
| Er, this stuff all died a death, thankfully, when admin zapped several of the threads earlier this week. No need to resurrect the argument now. Dave > > Dude your full of shit, on what grounds could he sue > anyone for calling him a porn director. Our views arent > published in a magazine or news letter. Were just people > on an internet forum voicing our views, and thats that we > dont want an imaginary director. I wikipedia'd him and the > only thing that comes up with his name is south australian > businessman. Dont sound like the master of the craft you > described > > Mr. Haase has never been involved in the production of any > > XXX venture as a director or producer. As a writer. > > particularly after a career which has been marked by > > literary work of the highest quality, Mr. Haase resents > > these attempts to slander him by purposely > > mis-characterizing an impeccable career by a single > > advertisement that was never answered. > > > > As a writer, Mr. Haase believes strongly in the first > > amendment--free speech, free thought--and will write > > whatever he pleases. Further, the proof of the slander is > > your posting an obscure ad which was never answered when > > examples of Mr. Haase's work abound on the Internet, > > including his best-selling cookbook, his AUDELCO-nominated > > production of Frederick Douglass, and his acclaimed > > production of Stephen Schwartz's Godspell in > > Harlem. > > > > Periodically, we investigate all side thoughts, ideas, > > etc., but Mr. Haase has never been actively involved in > > the direction or production of pornography and will sue > > anyone who calls him or implies him to be a pornographer, > > including you. > > > > > Again, to drill it into your head: > > > > > > Mr. Haase has NEVER directed or produced porno. As a very > > > young man in his 20s, he wrote an erotic screenplay as a > > > lark, for which he was not a member of the production > > > team. He has written and published numerous pieces of > > > high-end erotic fiction, of which he is not ashamed. The > > > vast majority of his career, the part YOU should be > > > focusing on, has been spent adapting classic literature to > > > mainstream media. > > > > > > P.S. In case you were curious, no one responded to that > > > ad. A pity, if you ask me...in the middle of a worldwide > > > depression, with a family to raise, in a desperate moment, > > > Mr. Haase entertained a thought that was never followed up > > > on, either by him or anyone else for that matter. > > > > > > > There is a distinct difference between porn and erotica. > > > > Erotica is like CALIGULA, acted, fictional and depicted. > > > > Porn is just a straight shot of sex. Richard develops a > > > > very large line of projects for potential buyers, from > > > > educational shows to religious shows to erotica, all > > > > genres depend on the buyer. Erotica is not porno. Imply > > > > he's a pornographer again, and he'll not only take you to > > > > court, he'll get the whole damn board shut down. > > > > > > > > > > hotprojects(at)nyc(dot)rr(dot)com > > > > > > > > > > I don't think I'll bother ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > href="http://www.pornojunkies.com/archive/index.php/t-8784.html">"Hit > > > > > him up" yourself matey > > > > > > > > > > Dave | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Another note - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 01:09 pm UTC 01/08/09 |
| Next: | Formal statement - wordnix 03:33 pm UTC 01/04/09 |
| Thread: | |