re: What Meat should have done | |
Posted by: ![]() |
Markus 09:49 am UTC 03/01/09 |
In reply to: | re: What Meat should have done - Smeghead 06:12 am UTC 03/01/09 |
On the other side: thatīs the nature of many of Jims songs. Still think there are not many others out there being able to do Jims songs like Meat did over 20 years. > It isn't about singing 6 days a week. Plenty of > professional singers do that. The problem is that Meat > didn't sing properly. He screamed and screeched, and tore > up his voice. > > > To prevent Meats voice from going out during the first Bat > > out of Hell gig was to go on tour for a couple of weeks at > > a time and then take time off. That way, he could have > > taken about another couple of weeks to let his voice heal > > as well as his body. He would have been able to keep > > focused and on track way better than singing 6 days a > > week-every week!! Then maybe, just maybe things could have > > turned out alot differently. He could have sang on Bad for > > Good, never had that weird break-down that he did, > > possibly had a better relationship with Steinman, Bat 3 > > could have been the 'Real Deal' etc. etc. | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: What Meat should have done - Smeghead 06:12 am UTC 03/01/09 |
Next: | re: What Meat should have done - Pudding 07:21 pm UTC 03/01/09 |
Thread: |
|