| re: AMerican idol | |
|
Posted by: |
Vin 06:08 pm UTC 03/04/09 |
| In reply to: | re: AMerican idol - Pudding 03:39 am UTC 03/04/09 |
| I think the issue is that Jim gets so little exposure as it is, when it does happen, his fans are pretty anxious for the impression to be a positive one. The fruitcake who killed IDAFL last night just backed up every music critic who has long since written the song off as a cheesy "80s" power-ballad, rendering it further back into the closets of "fringe" music fans. But hey, at least Randy said he loved the song. > But did they have fun? > > I think it's only Steinmaniacs who get neurotic about the > concept of a Jim song or wacky Loafers who wants to chop > the balls off some poor bastard who dares to sing the same > song Meat has ever sung. > > So long as they had fun that's the main thing. > > > They did reallyu bad, missed the concept of the song > > > > > Did anything for love | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: AMerican idol - Pudding 03:39 am UTC 03/04/09 |
| Next: | re: AMerican idol - Klasien 10:59 am UTC 03/04/09 |
| Thread: | |